Sure, I understand 100 pages of fresh content might be a little much, but I will tell you what I found.

I was browsing through hotscripts.com and found a program called RSStatic.

Here is how this program works:

Typical web based RSS aggregators simply allow you to publish a headline and link from your chosen feed. This provides you with fresh content on your site and gives visitors a potential reason to return. This offers very little value to search engine optimization efforts. RSStatic goes one step beyond that.

RSStatic takes information from the feeds you choose and generates static html pages for each item in the feed. This quickly turns a 10 page website into a much larger, more robust site complete with relevant content that continually grows.

I installed this as a way to share some of my favorite feeds with my site visitors. I did not submit this page to the search engines. A few days later I noticed the increase in traffic while viewing my stats and referring URLs. If you have a look at this URL from Google you can see it found about 300 new pages from the installation of this script.

Well... I guess I get to share my favorite feeds with more people then just my site visitors.

I guess if someone wanted to use this for a good tool to bring in targeted hits, they could make sure that the feeds they included were site and keyword related. At least it doesn't cost a lot, and the content is fresher. So comparatively speaking, I don't see the advantage of using "RSS Indexed" over the free RSStatic.